Life is a funny thing.
So, as you can imagine, it has been an interesting 3 days.
For those who aren’t already aware, Scott Adams (The creator of Dilbert) has taken an interest in my strip. He e-mailed me out of the blue a couple of months ago to tell me that he liked my work. I wrote back that if he turned out to be one of my comedian buddies jerking me around, “A river of bloody tears (would) flow.” He verified that it was indeed him, and I started groveling.
We traded e-mails back and fourth for the next couple of months, mostly discussing the prospect of me pursuing syndication for Basic Instructions. I decided to make a serious attempt and started sending him the sample strips in hopes of getting his opinion and a few pointers. He has been extremely generous with his advice, and it was his idea to post the whole process to his blog. I agreed (I’m not an idiot) and upgraded my hosting service. Then, I waited to see what would happen.
Wednesday morning he posted the first installment of our little experiment. My server bogged down to a standstill almost immediately and had crashed completely within the hour. Finally we got the server problem fixed and I had only a few minutes to skim the first comments on Adams’ blog before I had to go to work. The comments were very positive about everything but my server, which they all pointed out, sucked.
I went to work and found it very difficult to concentrate.
The next morning I checked my web stats. Over 17,000 unique visitors in 24 hours. That is a “substantial” increase from the day before.
In fairness to my web host, we did eventually get a tech support person who knew what she was talking about, and the server has been working like a champ ever since.
I haven’t had time to read all of the comments yet but they are skewing heavily toward the positive end of the spectrum. I read what comments I could yesterday until it was time to go to work.
Again, I had trouble concentrating.
This morning my web stats showed over 16,000 unique visitors, but 30,000 more page views than the day before. I find this encouraging.
In his most recent post about my strip, Scott Adams lays out what he sees as the choice before me. I will paraphrase it as a 50% chance at becoming the next Get Fuzzy vs. a 90% chance at becoming the next Red Meat. My reaction is that I’d be thrilled at either option. I’m just going to keep working and see what happens next.
This morning Mr. Adams (I have a really hard time calling him “Scott“) e-mailed me and asked how all this feels. My answer was "Fan-Freaking-Tastic!! And a little terrifying."
I’ll end with a couple of answers to frequently asked questions, then I’ll get out of your hair.
Yes, I am working on a book. Hopefully I’ll have some news about that soon. We’ll see.
Yes, I do have a plan for how to handle Sunday color strips. They’d just be the strip as it currently runs on the web, just shaped slightly different and in color. It would work as a good clearinghouse for strips that don’t break up into dailies well.
Yes, The strip is currently available in print. In fact I owe a huge apology to the Seattle Weekly and its editor, Mark Fefer. He was the first publishing professional to ever show any faith in me, and I have repaid that faith by moving to the other side of the continent and not mentioning his paper on my website.
Yes, I recognize that I am the luckiest guy on Earth.
For those who aren’t already aware, Scott Adams (The creator of Dilbert) has taken an interest in my strip. He e-mailed me out of the blue a couple of months ago to tell me that he liked my work. I wrote back that if he turned out to be one of my comedian buddies jerking me around, “A river of bloody tears (would) flow.” He verified that it was indeed him, and I started groveling.
We traded e-mails back and fourth for the next couple of months, mostly discussing the prospect of me pursuing syndication for Basic Instructions. I decided to make a serious attempt and started sending him the sample strips in hopes of getting his opinion and a few pointers. He has been extremely generous with his advice, and it was his idea to post the whole process to his blog. I agreed (I’m not an idiot) and upgraded my hosting service. Then, I waited to see what would happen.
Wednesday morning he posted the first installment of our little experiment. My server bogged down to a standstill almost immediately and had crashed completely within the hour. Finally we got the server problem fixed and I had only a few minutes to skim the first comments on Adams’ blog before I had to go to work. The comments were very positive about everything but my server, which they all pointed out, sucked.
I went to work and found it very difficult to concentrate.
The next morning I checked my web stats. Over 17,000 unique visitors in 24 hours. That is a “substantial” increase from the day before.
In fairness to my web host, we did eventually get a tech support person who knew what she was talking about, and the server has been working like a champ ever since.
I haven’t had time to read all of the comments yet but they are skewing heavily toward the positive end of the spectrum. I read what comments I could yesterday until it was time to go to work.
Again, I had trouble concentrating.
This morning my web stats showed over 16,000 unique visitors, but 30,000 more page views than the day before. I find this encouraging.
In his most recent post about my strip, Scott Adams lays out what he sees as the choice before me. I will paraphrase it as a 50% chance at becoming the next Get Fuzzy vs. a 90% chance at becoming the next Red Meat. My reaction is that I’d be thrilled at either option. I’m just going to keep working and see what happens next.
This morning Mr. Adams (I have a really hard time calling him “Scott“) e-mailed me and asked how all this feels. My answer was "Fan-Freaking-Tastic!! And a little terrifying."
I’ll end with a couple of answers to frequently asked questions, then I’ll get out of your hair.
Yes, I am working on a book. Hopefully I’ll have some news about that soon. We’ll see.
Yes, I do have a plan for how to handle Sunday color strips. They’d just be the strip as it currently runs on the web, just shaped slightly different and in color. It would work as a good clearinghouse for strips that don’t break up into dailies well.
Yes, The strip is currently available in print. In fact I owe a huge apology to the Seattle Weekly and its editor, Mark Fefer. He was the first publishing professional to ever show any faith in me, and I have repaid that faith by moving to the other side of the continent and not mentioning his paper on my website.
Yes, I recognize that I am the luckiest guy on Earth.
26 Comments:
I'm sure luck has something to do with it but talent as well. Thanks for the strip - I'm really enjoying it.
Agreed, it is just talent. You know how to make laught, thanks!!!
Congratulations on the well-deserved recognition. I'm also happy to hear that you're working on a book. Please keep us posted on its availability.
What an amazing story. It's very interesting watching it unfold. Keep up the great work!
I found out about your strip from the dilbert blog... read Scott Admams' blog long enough and you'll feel comfortable calling him Scott! I've read all your archives (while at work, which was against my better judgment and resulted in my office-mate thinking that I'm snorting cocaine at my desk) and now I'm just looking forward to your next new strip! While I'm not a huge fan of the webcomic-turned-syndicate idea, I do wish you the best of luck and here's to an exciting journey!
Well, I've said this at Scott's Dilbert blog, but I'll say it again here - I think you need to accept the help gratefully, but take the advice with a grain of salt.
For instance, I find your original Apply the Laws of Physics to Relationships stuff about twice to three times as interesting and funny as the revised stuff. I also liked "I never used to menstruate," but "cry so much" will do in a pinch.
Maybe you're too good/smart/edgy for general syndication? You could probably spin this out into the first truly successful (as in $500K/yr on advertising revenues) web-only cartoon. I'm definitely dialed in as one of the new loyal 16,000.
And as for aspirations to "Get Fuzzy," please don't tell the Get Fuzzy guy, but his strip has sucked for me lately, ever since the dog started doing extreme poetry.
Luck is increased by talent and also hard work - this strip is funny. I am slightly more happy because I have found yet another comic to read.
I'd have to second Chris' "grain of salt" advice. I also agree that "Apply the Laws of Physics to Relationships" was MUCH funnier as it was originally written.
Either way, I'm sure I'll keep reading.
I have been reading Basic Instructions and The Dilbert Blog for quite some time before the two converged this week. And I know Adams is the professional and I'm just a schmoe leaving comments on your blog, but I have to agree with the other two commenters to this post. Not only is your original Laws of Physics panel funnier than the new strip-ified versions, but I think the original four-panel layout is much easier to read and much more fluid than Adams' suggestion. I beg of you. Don't change. And don't get all weak with your comedy either. The edginess is what makes the comic great, on top of your keen ability to illustrate facial expressions. Don't let Adams bastardize it. You're too good for that.
Don't be so sure about the luck. After all, Branch Rickey said "Luck is the residue of design."
I love comics; I read about 20 every day. With the possible exception of Dilbert, yours is the funniest. I think you have a chance of becoming the next Dilbert. Congratulations.
As others have said, it wasn't luck, it was genius. But the two panel strips plus intro aren't working, so my suggestion is to (1) drop the intro; (2) start with your existing 4 panel cartoons; (3) eliminate the weakest panel; (4) eliminate the instructions at the top of each panel or at least reduce them to a few words. Here are my ten favorites with the panels I'd keep:
How to Deal With Visions - April 8, 2007 (2 and 4)
How to Justify an Extravagant Purchase to Your Spouse - June 10, 2007 (1, 2, and 3)
How to Buy a Car - March 18, 2007 (1, 3, and 4)
How to Act Casual - February 4, 2007 (2, 3, and 4)
How to Fight Against Conventional Wisdom - Dec 17, 2006 (1, 2, and 4)
How to Share a Movie You Love - August 5, 2007 (1, 2, and 4)
How to Slow the Spread of Germs - July 29, 2007 (1, 2, and 3)
How to Listen to Other People's Problems - June 17, 2007 (1, 2, and 4)
How to Remember Names - May 20, 2007 (1, 2 combined with 3, 4)
How to Give Directions - February 11, 2007 (2, 3, and 4)
I read all your strips twice, and on re-reading them I was surprised to find that the dialogue alone was enough to make me laugh - the instructions weren't necessary.
Just wanted to fourth the grain of salt comment. Regarding the menstruate thing, which was way more funny than crying, maybe you could get away with it if you weren't quite as blatant about it and said something along the lines of "And I didn't used to have certain problems at certain times of the month" I don't know that's the best I could think of in a few minutes.
I too discovered your site via the Dilbert blog, and don't tell Mr Adams, but I think your strip is way funnier than his. I read your whole archive and was laughing out loud. Something Dilbert hasn't made me do in a long time.
I don't know anything about syndication nessessities, but I much prefer your original four panel format. In two panels you just don't have enough room to get deep into the subject.
IMHO
Yours are a lot funnier than Dilbert to me. Dilbert is more like an act of pitiful revenge against my boss, hehe. Yours are real funny and that is better.
But, of course, Mr Adams blog is the best out there.
I think Jim's right.
it's the best of both ways
keep up the good work
Hi Scott,
First off - a wonderful comic. If there was a free daily email I'd subscribe like I do to dilbert.
I also really like the square format, but can understand what Scott Adams means. Reading your news and the comments here though I think you can get away with the "normal" strip format on two conditions:
1) Keep the Sunday version as a square like you said you would.
2) Follw Jim's Advice with a "but". I went baack and re-read the ones Jim mentioned and they woudl work with three panels and no introduction. BUT if you can keep just the first sentence then do. I think it adds a lot to each panel, the rest of the text is comparatively - i don't want to say unimportant, but you could do away with it and not lose much.
Do try and keep one short scene-setter per panel though - it's what makes the cartoon stnad out for me and is REALLY good.
Huh. Everybody is giving you advice.
I came here through the Dilbert blog. I subscribed to your feed and read all of your old comics. I think you're funnier than Dilbert, and I like the edginess.
But, maybe I belong to an insignificant group people who feel that way, and you'll make more money changing your strip to fit the main stream.
I don't like the main stream much. I hope you stay interesting, and have all the success you could ask for doing it.
Good luck!
(stay cool!)
Also, may I be the first to say, "Sell out! Scott sucks!" :)
The best part of your site is the disclaimer: "Basic Instructions" is a comic strip. Any advice contained herein is intended as humor, and should not be followed as actual instructions or advice."
I found your site on Bloggers: "Blog of Note"
Would you be interested in a link swap? Please visit my site at: http://mondaymorningpower.blogspot.com. My site is “Dedicated to the Pursuit, Capture, Care & Feeding of a Positive Mental Attitude.” I have zero adds on my site. I feel that what I have to say has universal significance. If you like what you see and agree, then link my site to yours, leave me a comment on my blog that you have done so and I will immediately do the same. I only make this offer to sites that I know my readers would benefit from.
Congratulations on a great comic. I've been forwarding links to friends for 3 days.
I got here from the Dilbert blog, and your comics were so funny I had to read the entire archive. Now I'm impatient for your next update. :) Great work!
I've been reading your strip for a couple months now, and I third (thirded?) the "grain of salt" advice. I think your strip is hilarious because it is edgy. Your humor runs the risk of offending the reader and you tackle subjects that other comics won't touch. But I think that's part of the appeal.
Examples: The "have you talked to your kids about smoking" comic. That was absolute genius. And the hate-mail that would generate if it ran in a newspaper spread would be awe inspiring. Another example is the banner of the 2x4 and "knowledge." Comedy gold, but not suitable to print.
At the end of the day it is worthwhile to consider whether or not the elements that make this strip funny would translate to bovine America.
Keep up the good work.
I just went back and read the Dilbert blog. Goddamn, the entries on "Basic Instructions" read like a fucking "choose your own adventure" book.
If you think I should advise Scott to ditch the relationship theme, turn to page 25.
If you think he should devote more time to it, turn to page 30.
And what gets me is how often his advice led to a worse product.
Who is the millionaire comic and who are the unwashed internet schlubs? Who SHOULD know more about this business??
I found Basic Instructions via the Dilbert Blog, and I just spent (more than) my entire lunch break reading through the archives. I have to say I prefer the original four-panel layout--it just flows better.
Oh, and this may be nitpicky, but I don't think the Dilbert font works well for the "instructions".
... oh, and I don't really care for the "TOMORROW" teaser thing either. I think it unnecessarily distracts from the punchline.
are you bald?
I've been reading Basic Instructions since about January of this year... absolutely hilarious stuff. I'd keep the format you have now - it works well, and has our office in stitches every week.
Post a Comment
<< Home